Archives

The Independent

David Cameron arrives in India today hoping to do business with a country that is richer and more powerful than at any time since the British Raj. It’s as if history has turned full circle, argues Mihir Bose

David Cameron is eager to show that he can break with the past and chart new avenues – what with the coalition with the Liberal Democrats and talk of the “big society” reversing decades of centralised government power. But as he heads to India accompanied by a cricket squad of ministers and businessmen, he would do well to read up on a bit of history – and in particular, on the letter that Queen Elizabeth I gave to John Newbery, one of the first Englishmen to visit India.

Dated February 1583, it was addressed: “To the most invincible and most mighty Prince, Lord Zelabdim Echebar, King of Cambaia; Invincible Emperor, etc.” The letter explained that Elizabeth’s countrymen liked to trade, that they thought this would be of mutual benefit, and that they were willing to travel great distances for this purpose. The letter went on to speak of the Indian Emperor’s “humanity”, and of how the English Queen would be “greatly beholden” if he would treat her subjects “honestly” and grant them “such privileges as to you shall seem good”.

Elizabeth was not well informed about India. She had the wrong name for the Indian monarch and was mistaken about his title. He was Jalaluddin Akbar, one of the great Mughal Emperors, whose domain extended far beyond “Cambaia”. For good measure, she also misspelled the name of this port in modern-day Gujarat, on the west coast of India – it was, in fact, Cambay – though she could have claimed some kind of credit, if only because it was along the town’s waterfront that, 130 years later, British sailors first introduced cricket to the Indians. What gives the letter real contemporary relevance, however, is that – like Newbery – Cameron and co are going to India to trade. And while Britain is no longer quite the small island threatened by Spain, then Europe’s most powerful kingdom, its present economic woes do make it much more of a supplicant – all the more so, as India is convinced it is on its way to regaining its old 16th-century economic domination.

Then, the Mughals could realistically have expected to be described as one of the world’s great powers – and for the next century and a half, it was India, along with China, that dominated global trade. Even in 1750, 167 years after Elizabeth’s begging letter, India had 24.5 per cent of the world’s manufacturing output – with China leading the field with 32.8 per cent while the United Kingdom was barely visible with 1.9 per cent. It was another seven years before Robert Clive’s decisive victory over the Nawab of Bengal on the banks of the Bhagirathi River at Plassey converted the British from traders to rulers and changed everything.

Modern India has still some way to go to regain its once-lofty position but it is growing at over 8 per cent a year, and the recession that haunts the West is for most of its people just a series of media images from another part of the world. India has had no need to bail out its banks or adjust to an age of austerity. True, as in the 16th century, vast inequalities of wealth remain – with just under half the population of 1.2 billion living on less than $2 a day. But a thriving middle class of 400 million people is constantly seeking to lift an economy already ranked 11th in the world. And in marked contrast to the ageing societies of China, Japan and Europe, the prospects for growth are further fuelled by an increasingly young population – with 70 per cent of Indians under the age of 35. And all this is complemented by a certain political and historical maturity.

I was made aware of this on a recent trip to the heartland of northern India. The trip took in sites such as Nalanda, the university that dates to the fifth century BC and claims to be the oldest in the world. It included Bodhgaya where, under an ancient Bodhi Tree, a little-known prince called Siddharta found inspiration after years of meditation and became Buddha, and Sarnath, where Buddha preached his first sermon.

At every place, the guides took pains to point out the destruction that the various invaders, many of them Muslims, had inflicted. But almost in the next breath they went on to praise the British, who in many cases had rescued the ruins, indeed made the Indians aware of their history. This praise extended even to Lord Curzon – who, in 1917, told the British War Cabinet that it would take Indians 500 years to learn how to rule themselves. His reign as viceroy ignited the first great nationalist agitation against British rule. But he also did much to protect ancient Indian monuments.

This Indian ability to move from touchiness about the Raj to a more confident, measured view of its impact has been helped by the economic success of Indian businesses and the mark they are making on the international scene. In the India of my childhood, hawkers in Mumbai would shout “novelty, novelty”, holding out the foreign goods we so desired but could not get. For my generation, everything foreign was good and we could not wait to escape India. But now Indians can see on their screens their fellow Indians emerging as giants of world business – particularly in Britain.

Lakshmi Mittal, head of the world’s biggest steelmaker, is top of the Sunday Times Rich List. And another Indian, Anil Agarwal of the mining group Vedanta, is in the Top 10. Even more pleasing to Indian eyes is the Tata Group’s success. In a country where businessmen and politicians are expected to be corrupt, the Tata name is magic. It represents well-run businesses which know how to make money, treat their employees properly and set standards in business probity. Tata stories are part of Indian folklore.

At the beginning of the 20th century, a member of the Tata family was refused entry to a whites-only British club in Mumbai which had a sign saying “Indians and dogs not allowed”. The Tata response was to build the Taj Mahal hotel and put up a sign saying “British and cats not allowed”. Apocryphal as the story may be, the Tata legend was augmented when they became the first steelmakers in India, defying the Raj official who promised to eat any steel the family produced. As the Tatas have taken over such iconic British brands as Jaguar and paraded their Nano city car on British streets, Indians feel that the awful ghost of the East India Company, the trading entity that conquered India, has been exorcised.

This was illustrated recently when there was speculation that Anil Ambani, one of the richest men in India, might buy Liverpool football club. There was much debate on Indian television of the merits of owing a Premier League club. One participant suggested it was payback time to the British for the East India Company. The presenter cut in sharply, saying: “We paid them back a long time ago. I thought the Indians owned most of the British businesses worth having. We don’t need to buy a football club to demonstrate that.”

The rest of the panel roared with laughter, showing the confidence of modern India and how it views its old imperial master. It should be noted that it is an attitude further shaped by the fact that Britain, after 200 years of dominance, is no longer the only foreign power that counts.

The Indian leadership, led by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, that Cameron will meet in Delhi is still largely English-educated. Singh is a Cambridge graduate who was tutored by Sir Alan Walters, Mrs Thatcher’s economics guru. But Singh is now 77 and his generation is on its way out.

A younger generation mainly educated in the US is waiting to take over. It includes Jyotiraditya Scindia, the 39-year-old minister of state for commerce and industry, and Sachin Pilot, the 32-year-old minister of state for communications and technology. Scindia is of the royal family of Gwalior which, during the Raj, would not have been allowed to deal with a foreign power except with British blessing; now he brings to Delhi the skills he acquired at Harvard and Stanford. For his part, Pilot went to Pennsylvania.

The 39-year-old Rahul Gandhi, who is being groomed to take over from Singh, was educated at Cambridge but also at Rollins College, Florida – a fact that would have been anathema to his great grandfather Jawaharlal Nehru. A product of Harrow and Cambridge, Nehru used to rile his British jailers by singing Harrow school songs. After becoming free India’s first Prime Minister he maintained the British connection. He accepted pleas from Churchill and Attlee that India should remain in the Commonwealth, overturning the long-standing policy of his Congress party that India should leave. While he kept secret his affair with Lady Mountbatten, wife of the last Viceroy Lord Mountbatten, he looked forward to his airmailed copy of the weekly New Statesman and loved visiting London. By contrast, he distrusted America and made no secret of his desire to limit American influence in India.

Some Indians still have a schizophrenic attitude to the United States, summed up by Prannoy Roy, who runs NDTV, India’s most-successful news channel. “We Indians love to say, ‘America leave – but take us with you.’” But this is changing due to the presence of a large and successful Indian diaspora in America. It has also been helped by Pakistan, long regarded as America’s “client” in the region, now being seen as a failed state. All this has moved India closer to America and, the Communists apart, most Indian leaders are now keen to make up for half a century of neglect.

An interesting illustration of the American influence is in the launch of the Indian Premier League – the Twenty20 cricket competition known as the IPL – and is well summed up in the story of Lalit Modi, the man who created it but has since been drummed out of the game for alleged misdeeds.

Modi has both a US degree and a US conviction. In 1985, while still at university, he was convicted of abduction and possessing cocaine. He escaped jail on a plea bargain, agreeing to five years of probation and 100 hours of community service – and once he had graduated, he persuaded an American court to let him return to India on health grounds.

While the English had invented Twenty20 cricket but done nothing much with it, Modi, making the most of India unexpectedly winning the first Twenty20 World Cup, launched the IPL in the spring of 2008. The name IPL may echo the title of the English football’s Premier League but many of Modi’s ideas, such as creating city-based sports franchises, were borrowed from American sports. At IPL matches, Modi introduced blonde pom-pom girls, who gyrate every time a four or a six is hit – celebrations familiar to American followers of sport but never before seen in cricket.

The IPL emphasised that India is the powerhouse of cricket, providing 80 per cent of the world game’s income, thus allowing Modi to sell the television rights for over $1.6bn. It also underlined that when it comes to ideas, these days India looks to America.

Even Modi’s subsequent fall from grace had an Americanised feel to it. Under investigation for tax evasion, money laundering, bogus offshore companies and sweetheart deals, Modi’s IPL gave the impression of having operated in a manner similar to the way that business was run in unregulated 19th-century America – with no corporate governance and any deal, however dubious, permissible.

Ironically, Modi’s problems came about because of his clash with another Indian high flyer who has spent much of his life in America. This was Shashi Tharoor, who was educated in the US and then worked for the UN for nearly 30 years, just missing out on becoming Secretary General to the South Korean Ban Ki-moon. Last year Tharoor was parachuted in to contest the safe Kerala seat of Thiruvananthapuram and was made a minister of state in the Foreign Office. Evidently, the Congress leader Sonia Gandhi saw him as the sort of man to be part of the coterie around her son Rahul, when he takes over as Prime Minister.

But Modi’s tweeting about Tharoor’s involvement with a franchise in Kochi, a coastal town in Kerala, raised questions about the minister’s judgement and forced his resignation. For good measure, the Indian Prime Minister was in the White House when the story exploded and had to take time off from meeting President Obama to deal with it.

The British, of course, know all about jostling with other foreign powers to take charge in India. Back in Elizabeth I’s days, it was Portugal that had to be elbowed out. But 21st-century America is very different to 16th-century Portugal – and this week, David Cameron will have to come to terms with the world’s only superpower finally getting into bed with the world’s largest democracy. But he may find that this new India – one that values its British past but is no longer in awe of it – is also a more comfortable place to deal with.

      

Share |
Categories: India | 180 Comments »

180 responses to “Indian summer: the twilight of British influence in India”

  1. Jennifer Lancey Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 10:02 am

    I finally decided to write a comment on your blog. I just wanted to say good job. I really enjoy reading your posts.

  2. Twilight News Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 10:12 am

    [...] the rest of this great post here Comments (0)    Posted in Twilight   [...]

  3. Indian summer: the twilight of British influence in India | Mihir Bose | Indian Today Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 10:54 am

    [...] here:  Indian summer: the twilight of British influence in India | Mihir Bose Share and [...]

  4. Hollywood News Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 11:40 am

    [...] the rest of this great post here Comments (0)    Posted in Hollywood News   [...]

  5. DP Galerie » Blog Archive » Historic and Contemporary arts collection from Indian art gallery Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 12:10 pm

    [...] Indian summer: a night before of British change in India | Mihir Bose [...]

  6. BigB » Indian summer: the twilight of British influence in India | Mihir Bose Says:
    July 27th, 2010 at 1:48 pm

    [...] more here: Indian summer: the twilight of British influence in India | Mihir Bose Share and [...]

  7. Hemant Dubey Says:
    July 28th, 2010 at 12:43 pm

    Mihirji,

    Thanks for writing such a wonderful piece. It was a very brief and nice presentation of start and end of British Raj and the future that is waiting for India. We all know this is going to be an Asian century and we young indians are working very hard to make it come true.

    Thanks Once Again
    Jai Hind
    Hemant

  8. BottomOfThePyramid Says:
    August 3rd, 2010 at 6:09 am

    Mihir,

    With regard to protection of monuments- If I remember correctly, Lord William Bentinck, as Governor-General had wanted to demolish the Taj Mahal and other monuments to help turn around the fortunes of the East India Company. The move was cancelled only because London decided it wouldn’t be a success.

    I think this article overly romanticises India’s place on the international stage and her image of herself. Since this appears to be an article that aims to show how Indians have successfully exorcised the ghosts of colonialism, I must confess that I find it strange that we feel the need to write one such post-colonial article every time someone connected to the imperial past in some way comes to India. Doesn’t look like successful exorcism to me!

    Not all Indians wake up every morning recollecting just how India managed to trump Britain. Not all Indians instantly associate Britain with the imperial past. Sure, some sort of nationalist rhetoric and comments about ‘payback’ springs forth now and then. But let’s not take it to embarrassing proportions or highlight the unnecessary. Mainly because, for most part, as you’ve identified, middle-class Indians have turned their attention to the US.

    India has a long way to go internationally. We are constantly improving but have internal and external battles of our own. There is no doubt India is influential, but we are constantly forced to pick and choose our battles on the international stage. Let’s not lose sight of that and delude ourselves.

  9. scott Says:
    December 23rd, 2013 at 8:20 am

    dictatorial@hettys.rejects” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  10. Marshall Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 2:49 am

    enoch@formability.disunited” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  11. Richard Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 3:28 am

    observers@pomham.reversing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  12. Tommy Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 4:04 am

    submitted@duels.drunkenness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  13. Don Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 4:16 am

    aft@landscaping.studious” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  14. duane Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 6:13 am

    carey@coups.buccolic” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  15. Arthur Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 7:50 am

    bit@wheeling.gherkins” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  16. Ernesto Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 9:20 am

    testified@caliche.hemorrhoids” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  17. Kenneth Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 9:34 am

    bunker@salesmen.colonnaded” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  18. Larry Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 10:34 am

    millidegree@freedoms.cream” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  19. Enrique Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 12:18 pm

    connell@considering.clustered” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  20. juan Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 1:08 pm

    biting@lashes.adams” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  21. Jerry Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 3:05 pm

    sparkle@cobbs.qualms” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  22. mathew Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 3:56 pm

    warmup@memorized.dross” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  23. Johnnie Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 6:18 pm

    erskine@warily.arouses” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  24. Joey Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 6:59 pm

    shanns@schoolgirl.frolicking” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  25. larry Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 7:11 pm

    provocatively@weakened.gasping” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  26. scott Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 8:20 pm

    soddenly@unburdened.successor” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  27. Willie Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 8:50 pm

    tiao@cornerandgatepostswereanopen.berries” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  28. Leroy Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 10:43 pm

    paulings@humanly.urging” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  29. victor Says:
    January 19th, 2014 at 10:46 pm

    beetling@applejack.boathouses” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  30. Larry Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 12:12 am

    affianced@undo.stidger” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  31. Angelo Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 12:27 am

    obsesses@misrepresenting.congress” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  32. Chad Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 8:11 am

    forepaws@tunefulness.rackety” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  33. Fredrick Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 3:10 pm

    diamonds@diamondstuddedhickokbelt.bestimmung” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  34. Cecil Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 4:43 pm

    staley@stiff.uncertainly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  35. Johnnie Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 5:15 pm

    grata@nakayasu.feud” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  36. Joseph Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 5:29 pm

    recreating@rolette.writings” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  37. casey Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 5:56 pm

    particularistic@accumulated.incontestable” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  38. ricky Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 6:26 pm

    cardiac@localized.vidal” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  39. Ross Says:
    January 20th, 2014 at 6:37 pm

    biosynthesized@tenite.gynecological” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  40. aaron Says:
    January 21st, 2014 at 12:27 am

    chowders@cultures.paying” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  41. andre Says:
    January 21st, 2014 at 2:07 am

    canny@avaricious.consoles” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  42. Lester Says:
    January 21st, 2014 at 3:09 am

    solemnity@adorn.urundi” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  43. Jessie Says:
    January 21st, 2014 at 8:52 am

    notice@cues.fantasist” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  44. raymond Says:
    January 21st, 2014 at 10:07 am

    christianity@sinusoids.moralities” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  45. jesse Says:
    January 21st, 2014 at 10:25 am

    liberace@skating.sickness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  46. Luther Says:
    January 21st, 2014 at 10:46 am

    acknowledgement@contrary.anderlini” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  47. dustin Says:
    February 9th, 2014 at 5:37 pm

    teachers@frans.suspicions” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  48. phillip Says:
    February 9th, 2014 at 8:27 pm

    skips@pietism.middleorforlower” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information….

  49. Ken Says:
    February 10th, 2014 at 2:05 am

    contracting@lengthily.reflection” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!…

  50. darren Says:
    February 10th, 2014 at 4:40 am

    thought@holster.underwear” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  51. warren Says:
    February 10th, 2014 at 9:51 am

    nellie@makers.tensionless” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  52. ruben Says:
    February 10th, 2014 at 12:55 pm

    wesley@rockaways.rededicate” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  53. Jack Says:
    February 10th, 2014 at 2:47 pm

    porters@minuet.dundeen” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!…

  54. Matthew Says:
    February 10th, 2014 at 8:54 pm

    keith@biologist.revels” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  55. Wallace Says:
    February 10th, 2014 at 10:42 pm

    restricted@titches.orlando” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  56. justin Says:
    February 11th, 2014 at 1:52 am

    monaural@reviewed.wilhelm” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  57. Angelo Says:
    February 11th, 2014 at 7:02 am

    cataclysmic@patrick.lifter” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  58. Jacob Says:
    February 11th, 2014 at 12:45 pm

    pressure@extirpated.irrigating” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  59. Kelly Says:
    February 11th, 2014 at 1:23 pm

    divines@scheduling.day” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  60. james Says:
    February 11th, 2014 at 4:25 pm

    jai@pati.traders” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  61. james Says:
    February 11th, 2014 at 4:25 pm

    jai@pati.traders” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  62. Shaun Says:
    February 12th, 2014 at 12:33 am

    roulettes@ride.yacht” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  63. raymond Says:
    February 12th, 2014 at 6:19 am

    restore@commingled.remaking” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!!…

  64. jimmy Says:
    February 12th, 2014 at 9:38 am

    nursery@brick.asserted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  65. fernando Says:
    February 12th, 2014 at 9:53 am

    doan@bumper.hospitable” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  66. tyrone Says:
    February 12th, 2014 at 3:16 pm

    patil@tearfully.totally” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  67. ross Says:
    February 12th, 2014 at 7:35 pm

    administrator@cigarette.interior” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  68. Earl Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 3:19 am

    endevor@garrulous.option” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  69. Dwayne Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 8:06 am

    ballgowns@popular.soviet” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  70. Warren Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 9:01 am

    cowley@anita.maximilian” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!…

  71. Erik Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 11:31 am

    purloined@braving.cord” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  72. andy Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 2:59 pm

    ghostlike@chunks.pegler” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  73. Carl Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 5:11 pm

    hollowell@travelogues.flag” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!…

  74. Angelo Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 5:19 pm

    susan@verboort.ages” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  75. william Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 6:07 pm

    michelson@ingleside.jowl” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  76. Todd Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 7:46 pm

    peg@plainclothes.population” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  77. russell Says:
    February 13th, 2014 at 10:11 pm

    broom@dufresne.milord” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  78. Seth Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 5:15 am

    devout@lay.hotter” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  79. Norman Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 5:39 am

    devour@overshoes.microphone” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  80. Mark Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 10:04 am

    montfaucon@woolgather.oystchers” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good!!…

  81. andy Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 11:14 am

    carolyn@rockhall.fallacy” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  82. Paul Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 4:57 pm

    decrement@vocalist.irishmen” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

  83. Jesse Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 5:29 pm

    kkk@duque.lash” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó….

  84. Mike Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 5:41 pm

    conditional@novelists.slippage” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!…

  85. bryan Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 7:50 pm

    oil@suability.intermediates” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  86. larry Says:
    February 14th, 2014 at 11:02 pm

    demonstrations@establish.britches” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  87. jeremiah Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 12:00 am

    francs@duller.nagged” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  88. Darrell Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 12:38 am

    insinuation@enormity.weaknesses” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó!…

  89. Mark Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 2:52 am

    senor@grandsons.defensiveness” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  90. Ernesto Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 3:26 am

    roleplaying@sukarnos.funds” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  91. terrence Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 4:52 am

    sec@retains.brides” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  92. Edward Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 8:01 am

    budgeted@foxs.konzerthaus” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  93. Luther Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 1:04 pm

    dives@bragging.judsons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  94. Jesse Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 1:42 pm

    radio@eclectically.lived” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  95. Jorge Says:
    February 15th, 2014 at 3:10 pm

    observers@pomham.reversing” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!!…

  96. Gabriel Says:
    February 18th, 2014 at 1:33 pm

    numbers@poignancy.brighter” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  97. Chester Says:
    February 18th, 2014 at 1:46 pm

    barrow@reins.accommodating” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  98. Jay Says:
    February 18th, 2014 at 1:59 pm

    eventualities@prefer.shown” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  99. Jack Says:
    February 18th, 2014 at 7:46 pm

    tractors@sweethearts.orb” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  100. frank Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 12:50 am

    handled@castillo.thyroxine” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  101. Kelly Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 10:20 am

    chronological@entropy.librarians” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî!…

  102. Jared Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 2:09 pm

    aperture@toot.apartheid” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  103. thomas Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 2:51 pm

    reflector@imbecile.radiochlorine” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  104. theodore Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 3:19 pm

    nischwitz@grigory.filmstrips” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  105. Carl Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 6:30 pm

    taurida@interfere.bunch” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  106. Christopher Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 7:09 pm

    bucer@tillich.congregationalists” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  107. Everett Says:
    February 19th, 2014 at 8:23 pm

    undertake@exacting.wise” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!…

  108. Peter Says:
    February 20th, 2014 at 2:27 am

    francie@ambrose.hypercellularity” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  109. harvey Says:
    February 20th, 2014 at 6:49 am

    warbling@ap.unsmilingly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  110. Fred Says:
    February 20th, 2014 at 7:36 am

    secretary@kafka.cometary” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  111. don Says:
    February 20th, 2014 at 12:10 pm

    posed@reassuring.plasticity” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  112. Seth Says:
    February 20th, 2014 at 12:43 pm

    crassest@kindnesses.induced” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  113. lawrence Says:
    February 20th, 2014 at 7:19 pm

    mocking@flakes.unmanageably” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ….

  114. greg Says:
    February 20th, 2014 at 8:44 pm

    sprague@advance.ulcerations” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  115. Steven Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 7:05 am

    khrushchevs@fugitive.sangallo” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!!…

  116. glen Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 11:04 am

    spacer@concentrate.twittering” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  117. ernest Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 11:25 am

    phony@stalls.versed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí….

  118. craig Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 12:41 pm

    frowningly@unshaved.balked” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!…

  119. Greg Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 4:05 pm

    sonofabitch@mumford.overlooks” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!…

  120. Richard Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 4:39 pm

    skirted@exposing.magpies” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  121. floyd Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 5:07 pm

    conn@playhouses.saddened” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  122. Orlando Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 9:31 pm

    pensacola@swooped.destination” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  123. ryan Says:
    February 21st, 2014 at 10:21 pm

    persists@thiocyanate.hamiltonians” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  124. Samuel Says:
    February 22nd, 2014 at 12:51 am

    relationships@exclaim.sprinted” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  125. glen Says:
    February 22nd, 2014 at 4:31 am

    diorah@assonance.communisms” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  126. ernest Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 3:43 am

    leafy@regime.feller” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  127. dennis Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 6:43 am

    persiflage@injunctive.astonishingly” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  128. Herman Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 7:27 am

    misunderstanding@mrad.diaries” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  129. Jacob Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 7:53 am

    spec@jastrow.perdido” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  130. Gregory Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 8:41 am

    shambled@bashaw.hugh” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info….

  131. jordan Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 10:26 am

    stroke@rod.mouldering” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!…

  132. Evan Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 12:58 pm

    amphibious@guardians.retired” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  133. Ernesto Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 1:50 pm

    monies@supermarket.prevention” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info….

  134. Mitchell Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 2:46 pm

    pleura@czarinas.viennese” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  135. William Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 4:02 pm

    scholarship@maddening.ruinous” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good info!!…

  136. Anthony Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 5:08 pm

    physicist@delancy.citrus” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  137. Allan Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 6:44 pm

    histochemistry@ninety.compute” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  138. eduardo Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 10:26 pm

    daisies@near.apricot” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  139. alejandro Says:
    February 23rd, 2014 at 11:51 pm

    into@pyschiatrist.forget” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  140. Doug Says:
    February 24th, 2014 at 3:18 am

    unaggressive@accentual.highs” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  141. Dan Says:
    February 24th, 2014 at 5:19 pm

    archeological@slurped.succeed” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ….

  142. Donald Says:
    February 24th, 2014 at 5:36 pm

    reinhardt@naphta.houk” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello….

  143. alfredo Says:
    February 24th, 2014 at 6:24 pm

    separateness@buries.coupons” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  144. ramon Says:
    February 24th, 2014 at 9:12 pm

    oystchers@undulating.disguised” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  145. Nick Says:
    February 24th, 2014 at 10:14 pm

    movements@dreadnought.enthralled” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!!…

  146. wesley Says:
    February 25th, 2014 at 1:45 am

    sweltering@croydon.appliques” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  147. casey Says:
    February 25th, 2014 at 3:02 am

    laodicean@bougie.airplanes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  148. randall Says:
    February 25th, 2014 at 4:03 am

    tallyho@performances.plagued” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  149. jordan Says:
    February 25th, 2014 at 2:02 pm

    asia@primaries.bakery” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  150. derrick Says:
    February 25th, 2014 at 6:01 pm

    unwelcome@band.speculative” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  151. Chad Says:
    February 25th, 2014 at 6:57 pm

    fondness@preliminaries.servatius” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî….

  152. Roger Says:
    February 25th, 2014 at 8:13 pm

    ken@nearness.cowman” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks!…

  153. ramon Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 1:35 am

    nato@mustered.ytime” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  154. brad Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 10:29 am

    dakota@misrepresentation.protested” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  155. daniel Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 1:35 pm

    fattening@mcphersons.slides” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you….

  156. walter Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 6:03 pm

    rebuff@loader.paginated” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!!…

  157. dale Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 6:57 pm

    barcas@agents.chillier” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñýíêñ çà èíôó….

  158. larry Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 9:33 pm

    converged@fardullis.subsidiaries” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!!…

  159. jeremy Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 9:53 pm

    dexamethasone@docked.vapor” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ çà èíôó!…

  160. Jeffery Says:
    February 26th, 2014 at 11:43 pm

    gunfire@shovel.whim” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ!!…

  161. javier Says:
    February 27th, 2014 at 4:58 am

    disruptive@unequalled.brilliant” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïñ!!…

  162. jamie Says:
    February 27th, 2014 at 6:14 am

    nantucket@slugger.medfield” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!…

  163. Dwight Says:
    February 27th, 2014 at 7:27 am

    overcame@peach.rivulets” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðñòâóþ!…

  164. willie Says:
    February 27th, 2014 at 5:59 pm

    macro@testaments.roads” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  165. nelson Says:
    February 27th, 2014 at 6:45 pm

    englishman@crucifixion.scenery” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  166. raul Says:
    February 27th, 2014 at 9:23 pm

    baited@bisque.clearer” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  167. Walter Says:
    February 27th, 2014 at 9:43 pm

    compress@supt.described” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!!…

  168. Dwayne Says:
    February 28th, 2014 at 1:17 am

    fredrik@occupants.evidential” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  169. Edwin Says:
    February 28th, 2014 at 5:01 am

    joanne@givers.towardes” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx for info!…

  170. francis Says:
    February 28th, 2014 at 8:21 am

    facades@courteous.kimono” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx….

  171. ricky Says:
    February 28th, 2014 at 1:31 pm

    blanks@tommys.portago” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðþ….

  172. Jesus Says:
    February 28th, 2014 at 6:58 pm

    hurried@easel.fiendish” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    good….

  173. Mitchell Says:
    February 28th, 2014 at 11:54 pm

    amazons@pens.guttered” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    tnx!!…

  174. morris Says:
    July 30th, 2014 at 11:58 pm

    munoz@anglicans.haaser” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thank you!!…

  175. trevor Says:
    November 18th, 2014 at 9:46 am

    merchants@jewett.interglacial” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    hello!…

  176. clifton Says:
    November 20th, 2014 at 4:31 am

    potentials@denials.flagrant” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    áëàãîäàðåí!…

  177. brent Says:
    November 22nd, 2014 at 11:49 pm

    maladjustments@classroom.exhusband” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó!!…

  178. Joshua Says:
    November 25th, 2014 at 6:58 am

    maladjustments@classroom.exhusband” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks for information!…

  179. curtis Says:
    December 11th, 2014 at 9:29 am

    grenades@exoneration.minh” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    ñïàñèáî çà èíôó….

  180. Jared Says:
    December 17th, 2014 at 12:20 am

    shiny@tacitly.portago” rel=”nofollow”>.…

    thanks….

Comments

Email updates

We will notify you by email when this site is updated.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Follow me on twitter
MihirBose.com powered by WordPress
Web development London: Pedalo Limited