Race
Britain has a shared history with its immigrants — unlike America
Daily Telegraph
IN THE early 1980s, when London Weekend Television was about to launch its first programme aimed at ethnic minorities, I was interviewed for the job of presenter. The interview was the most unusual I have ever had. It turned into a ferocious argument between me and the white interviewer about the relevance of the American experience of dealing with immigration. I tried to argue that Britain’s experience was, historically, very different to that of America, and that blindly following their example would not be very useful. He disagreed and, needless to say, I did not get the job.
I have been reminded of that episode as, following the bombs in London, there have been many references to how American-born Muslims have not taken to the bomb — apparently proving the superiority of the American way of integrating minorities. The problem with this analysis is that it ignores historical differences between the countries.
Read more >
Britain has a shared history with its immigrants – unlike America
The Telegraph
In the early 1980s, when London Weekend Television was about to launch its first programme aimed at ethnic minorities, I was interviewed for the job of presenter. The interview was the most unusual I have ever had. It turned into a ferocious argument between me and the white interviewer about the relevance of the American experience of dealing with immigration. I tried to argue that Britain’s experience was, historically, very different to that of America, and that blindly following their example would not be very useful. He disagreed and, needless to say, I did not get the job.
I have been reminded of that episode as, following the bombs in London, there have been many references to how American-born Muslims have not taken to the bomb – apparently proving the superiority of the American way of integrating minorities. The problem with this analysis is that it ignores historical differences between the countries.
Read more >
We didn’t come here for the money
The prospect of prosperity lures some to Britain. Others have found that its greatest riches are not material after all
The Observer
TWENTY-FIVE years ago, when I decided to leave India and come back to this country for good, Shiva Naipaul invited me to dinner at his flat in Maida Vale and mockingly admonished me, saying, ‘So you have come back for more of the old colonial lash.’
Read more >
Under Ataturk’s portrait
New Statesman
Mihir Bose finds more headscarves and less raki as Turkey’s secular state faces creeping Islamisation
IT WAS as I took the ferry from Bandirma to Istanbul, two days before Turkey went to the polls and handed a landslide victory to the Islamic Justice and Development Party (AKP), that for the first time I began to understand the creeping Islamisation that the secularists of the country fear.
Read more >
Tell us the truth of the Empire
The Observer
BRITAIN’S polyglot possessions once covered a quarter of the globe, so why is the story told only from the white viewpoint? For the sake of all in our multicultural country we should look again at the history books
More than 30 years ago, soon after I first arrived in this country, I was taken to meet the father of an English girl I had got to know. He was a kindly man who said I should not believe the propaganda that Labour had given India independence; Churchill would have done the same had he won the 1945 elections. And, in any case, did I not think the Indians were better off under British rule and the British had done much good in India?
Read more >
Other Race articles
- Britain has a shared history with its immigrants — unlike America - August 16, 2005
- Britain has a shared history with its immigrants – unlike America - August 16, 2005
- We didn’t come here for the money - December 29, 2002
- Under Ataturk’s portrait - November 11, 2002
- Tell us the truth of the Empire - October 6, 2002
- Who does he think he is? The Aga Khan? - June 19, 2001
- Why I don’t believe the British are racists - February 25, 1999
